From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RFC for adding typmods to functions |
Date: | 2009-12-03 16:02:45 |
Message-ID: | 162867790912030802y70177720wf98cf0305b6e1ca2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/12/3 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Pavel Stehule escribió:
>> 2009/11/18 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
>> > On ons, 2009-11-18 at 11:46 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> >> I am not sure if SQL standard is good inspiration in this case.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure either, but I think it's premature to make a conclusion
>> > about that without having checked at all.
>>
>> ok, I recheck SQL/PSM part again :)
>
> So, did this go anywhere?
>
I am read a documentation - and I am not sure. It is not part of
SQL/PSM. It is part of Foundation (SQL/Foundation) - see CD
9075-2:200x(E)
11.50 <SQL-invoked routine>. Important is section 18.d.
one parameter from all parameter list have to be unique (types are not
compatible)
Section 9.18 Data type identity speaking what are identity types, but
I am missing definition what are not compatible types.
so I if I respect 18.d, then I have not a functions foo(varchar(30))
and foo(varchar(40)).
But i am not native speaker and SQL standard is cryptographic for me.
Please, can somebody check it again.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-12-03 16:03:32 | Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-03 16:00:58 | Re: patch - per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost |