From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Date: | 2009-10-05 15:43:26 |
Message-ID: | 162867790910050843h39b5c1b5ue97d3cc011d4bcf6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/10/5 Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org>:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:28:13AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Dan Colish wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:18AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote:
>>
>> > > > You can definitely create updatable views using rules.
>> > >
>> > > Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases.
>> > >
>> > > Search the archives for "updatable views" for details.
>> >
>> > I don't even want updatable views!
>>
>> Why would you argue that point? They are specified in the SQL standard
>> somewhere.
>>
>
> I do not really think updatable views are needed. Maybe when the standard was
> written things are different; I guess you're talking about 2003. Just because
> something is in a standard, doesnt mean it has to be implemented. As long as you
> don't implement something outside of the standard, I do not have an issue.
Updatable views are important for porting enterprise applications. I
thing, so it has a sense.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> --Dan
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-10-05 16:09:58 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-10-05 15:40:59 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |