| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Arnold, Sandra" <ArnoldS(at)osti(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Substitutes for some Oracle packages |
| Date: | 2009-09-17 20:47:16 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790909171347v2dd567c1p9384137642c434b7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
2009/9/17 Arnold, Sandra <ArnoldS(at)osti(dot)gov>:
> We are in the process of migrating from Oracle to PostgreSQL. One of the
> things that we are needing to find out is what to use in place of Oracle
> supplied functionality such as "DBMS_OUTPUT" and "UTL_FILE". We are
> currently using this type of functionality in Stored Procedures and
> packages. What are the options in PostgreSQL for replacing these two
> packages in a stored procedure/function?
> Thanks,
>
-
for typical use you can use RAISE NOTICE without DBMS_OUTPUT,
UTL_FILE isn't supported by core.
Migration process could be simplified by using Orafce package:
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/orafce/
http://orafce.projects.postgresql.org/
regards
Pavel Stehule
> Sandra Arnold
> Sr. DBA
> DOE/OSTI
> Oak Ridge, TN
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Gainty | 2009-09-17 20:48:23 | Re: 'Weird' errors |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-09-17 20:43:12 | Re: Does PG cache results of an aggregate function, (and results of non-volatile functions)? |