From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) |
Date: | 2009-08-19 15:21:44 |
Message-ID: | 162867790908190821i25b0ba35tdb9627a5318274e9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/8/19 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Here is a WIP patch for a foreign data wrapper based dblink.
>> It integrates dblink module into core and adds a new functionality,
>> automatic transaction management.
>
> I don't believe there is any consensus for integrating dblink into core,
> and I for one will resist that strongly. Keep it in contrib.
if integration means, so I could to write query like
SELECT * FROM otherdatabase.schema.table ....
UPDATE otherdb.table SET ...
I am for integration.
regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-08-19 15:24:19 | Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-19 15:16:49 | Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) |