Re: mixed, named notation support

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support
Date: 2009-08-06 05:38:21
Message-ID: 162867790908052238q857176dg5649904e769e49b2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/8/5 Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>:
> --On Mittwoch, August 05, 2009 05:28:55 +0200 Pavel Stehule
> <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> At least, we need to document that both notations behaves different in
>>> this case.
>>
>> +1
>
> Here again a patch version with updated documentation. I will stop reviewing
> this patch now and mark this ready for committer, so we have some time left
> to incorporate additional feedback.
>
> --
>  Thanks
>
>                   Bernd

my Thanks

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2009-08-06 06:14:51 Re: Fwd: [BUGS] fix: plpgsql: return query and dropped columns problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-06 03:32:06 Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables