Re: Build in spatial support vs. PostGIS

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Assaf Lavie <assaflavie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Build in spatial support vs. PostGIS
Date: 2009-06-21 13:41:49
Message-ID: 162867790906210641x1f31671dk711cec12e22a1ad3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello

2009/6/21 Assaf Lavie <assaflavie(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Can anyone please shed light on the difference between the two:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1023229/spatial-data-in-postgresql
> (login _not_ required)
>

some integrated support for spatial types are relative old thing
probably from academic era of pg. It's good demonstration of
PostgreSQL's universality and could be used in some isolated projects.
PostGIS is do same thing, but it is based on OpenGIS standard (and
SQL/MM) standard and it's very rich tool for operation over spatial
data. There are some GIS clients, that can draw data stored in OpenGIS
format.

regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-06-21 13:43:16 Re: cursors, temp tables, dynamic sql technique (was and is: looping over a small record set over and over in a function)
Previous Message Gerhard Wiesinger 2009-06-21 13:23:03 Re: Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone