From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Assaf Lavie <assaflavie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Build in spatial support vs. PostGIS |
Date: | 2009-06-21 13:41:49 |
Message-ID: | 162867790906210641x1f31671dk711cec12e22a1ad3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello
2009/6/21 Assaf Lavie <assaflavie(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Can anyone please shed light on the difference between the two:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1023229/spatial-data-in-postgresql
> (login _not_ required)
>
some integrated support for spatial types are relative old thing
probably from academic era of pg. It's good demonstration of
PostgreSQL's universality and could be used in some isolated projects.
PostGIS is do same thing, but it is based on OpenGIS standard (and
SQL/MM) standard and it's very rich tool for operation over spatial
data. There are some GIS clients, that can draw data stored in OpenGIS
format.
regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-06-21 13:43:16 | Re: cursors, temp tables, dynamic sql technique (was and is: looping over a small record set over and over in a function) |
Previous Message | Gerhard Wiesinger | 2009-06-21 13:23:03 | Re: Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone |