From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Juan Pereira <juankarlos(dot)openggd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
Date: | 2009-03-20 13:48:21 |
Message-ID: | 162867790903200648o68a2f0c5p3ccdddc22be86bef@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Hello
it isn't correct comparation.
MySQL people use mainly web forum
regards
Pavel Stehule
2009/3/20 Juan Pereira <juankarlos(dot)openggd(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> John Cheng wrote:
>
>>> This is question for Juan, have you asked the MySQL mailing list?
>
> I'm afraid MySQL general list isn't as dynamic as PostgreSQL general list.
>
> http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/216795
>
> MySQL general list: 4 answers in about 48 hours
> PostgreSQL general list: 27 answers in about 72 hours
>
>
> Thanks again to everybody for the amount of knowledge you have shared in
> this thread.
>
> Juan Karlos
>
>
> 2009/3/17 John Cheng <chonger(dot)cheng(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>
>> This is question for Juan, have you asked the MySQL mailing list? What do
>> they say about this?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The question is: Which DBMS do you think is the best for this kind of
>>>>> application? PostgreSQL or MySQL?
>>>>
>>>> As you can imagine, PostgreSQL.
>>>>
>>>> My main reasons are that in a proper transactional environment (ie
>>>> you're not using scary MyISAM tables) Pg is *much* better about handling
>>>> concurrent load, particularly concurrent activity by readers and
>>>> writers.
>>>
>>> Actually, following this comment it should be noted that if you were to
>>> choose MySQL you'd pretty much be making a decision to *not* be using
>>> transactions at all. The reason for this is that while InnoDB does support
>>> MySQL's geometry data types it does *not* support indexes on geometry
>>> columns, only MyISAM does which does not support transactions. Call me old
>>> fashioned if you like, but I like my data to have integrity ;)
>>>
>>> Erik Jones, Database Administrator
>>> Engine Yard
>>> Support, Scalability, Reliability
>>> 866.518.9273 x 260
>>> Location: US/Pacific
>>> IRC: mage2k
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - John L Cheng
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amitabh Kant | 2009-03-21 04:49:58 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
Previous Message | Juan Pereira | 2009-03-20 13:11:06 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben Ali Rachid | 2009-03-20 14:19:37 | Srf function : missing library on PostgreSQL 8.3.6 on Windows? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-03-20 13:46:09 | Breaking national language support in Solaris 8 |