From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Grzegorz Jaskiewicz" <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Date: | 2008-12-15 09:54:26 |
Message-ID: | 162867790812150154m1317f1efnb95f1fd5d7436de8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/12/15 Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>:
>
>> it's look well, but I still prefer some combination with =
>>
>> name: = ''
>> name: => '''
>> :name = ''
>> $name => ..
>> $name = ..
>
> I wonder about name := ''.
>
> := is used in Pascal/Ada to assign a value. Or would that again be an allowed operator in pg ?
>
I like it too, but there is problem with possible collision with
custom operator
Pavel
> Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-15 10:05:55 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-15 09:44:25 | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |