Re: Contrib, schema, and load_module

2008/10/11 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 11 oct. 08 à 01:50, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>
>>> It seems that the real way forward is to improve on that patch.
>>
>> Yeah. If the schema-per-module answer were really a good answer,
>> we'd have done it before now.
>
> I tried to spend some time thinking about those issues and came up with a
> packaging management proposal, which I still think has merits. One of them
> is to propose to reuse existing stuff and Tom Dunstan's preliminary work.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg01098.php
>

did you look to SQL/PSM standard?

Regards
Pavel Stehule

> Hope this helps,
> - --
> dim
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjwmCQACgkQlBXRlnbh1bmIggCdGqD8TwJE7CeZDCL+v5njPtib
> 4+kAoLVj3rDzsFpJvb/Zc20R+Jo/s5Z7
> =O6C6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>