From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard |
Date: | 2008-09-01 09:15:56 |
Message-ID: | 162867790809010215r5abd686bj6fc1ad7e6c0ae6b1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/9/1 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> 2008/8/31 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>>> It seems that we allow several function arguments to have same
>>> name (or is it label :)
>>>
>>> hannu=# create or replace function ff(a int, a int) returns int language
>>> plpgsql as $$begin return $1+$2; end;$$;
>>> CREATE FUNCTION
>>> hannu=# select ff(1,1);
>>> ff
>>> ----
>>> 2
>>> (1 row)
>>>
>>> hannu=# select ff(1,2);
>>> ff
>>> ----
>>> 3
>>> (1 row)
>>>
>>> hannu=# create or replace function ffa(a int, a int) returns int
>>> language plpgsql as $$begin return a + a; end;$$;
>>> CREATE FUNCTION
>>> hannu=# select ffa(1,2);
>>> ffa
>>> -----
>>> 2
>>> (1 row)
>>>
>>> Is this defined by some standard or just an oversight ?
>>>
>>
>> what is problem? You have two diferent functions. I don't see anything wrong.
>
> Take a look at the second function again. It's certainly not behaviour
> that I would expect :-) (I would expect a syntax error)
I see it now - it's really bug
Pavel
>
> //Magnus
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-09-01 09:47:10 | Re: Auto-explain patch |
Previous Message | Radek Strnad | 2008-09-01 09:01:39 | Re: WIP patch: Collation support |