Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Martin Pihlak" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-18 20:41:58
Message-ID: 162867790808181341r1a0fb37doc8dd8e1e9d260fdf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2008/8/18 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:05 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>> >> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches.
>> >>
>> >> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching.
>> >
>> > I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug.
>> >
>>
>> Does it change of result some queries?
>
> Not in the long run, but not invalidating the functions (current
> behaviour) postpones seeing the results of function change until DBA
> manually restarts the error-producing client.
>
>> It is protection to server's hang?
>
> Can't understand this question :(
>
> If you mean, does the change protect against hanging the server, then
> no, currently the server does not actually hang, it just becomes
> unusable until reconnect :(

Hi

I am sorry, but it's really new feature and not bug fix

Pavel
>
> ---------
> Hannu
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asko Oja 2008-08-18 20:49:06 Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-08-18 20:38:29 Re: Overhauling GUCS