| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: variadic function support |
| Date: | 2008-07-13 06:34:32 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790807122334t301efe1fk9ab4669972b22e25@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 07:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.
>
> Sorry for being unclear. Those comments regarded patch v2.2.1. The bug
> is in pg_function_is_visible().
it's bug, I'll fix it
>
> Additionally, I'd like to see support for calling variadic functions
> with no arguments. I mentioned that in my other email, but it applies to
> v2.2.1 as well.
for some cases, I can do less restriction.
>
> And we should come to a consensus quickly about the declaration style,
> e.g. "variadic int[]" or "variadic int".
ok
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
thank you very much
Pavel Stehule
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-13 16:32:08 | Re: variadic function support |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-07-13 06:32:43 | Re: variadic function support |