From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes |
Date: | 2008-07-03 10:22:21 |
Message-ID: | 162867790807030322k1ee3e09dn4a9ba3e9cdc8ae2a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/7/3 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> I'm using the nvl() function from the orafce package. It is defined as a
> polymorphic function so its function signature is
> nvl(anyelement, anyelement)
>
> Now if I try to use the function in this very typical way
> nvl(numeric_col, 0)
>
> we get
>
> ERROR: function nvl(numeric, integer) does not exist
>
> The same error occurs if we have nvl(smallint, integer) etc
>
> This is a real shame 'cos polymorphic functions ought to be a great way
> of saving development time and catalog space, yet they seem to fall down
> a hole without implicit casting.
>
> What I'd like it to do is to recognise that the 0 should be cast
> implicitly to another datatype within the same family. I want and expect
> nvl(char_column, 0)
> to fail, but I expect the various numeric/integer types we have to play
> nicely together without tears.
>
> If we can do it for indexes, can we do it for polymorphic functions also
> when there is no matching function?
>
+1
there is similar problem with literal constant.
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-07-03 10:47:48 | Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level |
Previous Message | Paul van den Bogaard | 2008-07-03 10:01:20 | Attaching and using the Postgres shared memory segment |