From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: variadic function support |
Date: | 2008-06-24 05:30:52 |
Message-ID: | 162867790806232230s365c88f0y3a7e8ea0ab9fffb2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
2008/6/23 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>
> And what about a function that takes 2 arrays as arguments?
only last argument is evaluated as variadic
so function
create or replace function foo(a int[], b int[]) ... variadic
is called
select foo(array[1,2,3], 1,2,3,4,5,6)
>
> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full
> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need
> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really syntactic
> saccharine).
there is some functions like Oracle's least,greater, decode that needs
this feature. So I can write wrappers. For me most important are new
possibility for C procedures. All this work is related to my JSON
support proposal.
Pavel
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-06-24 05:39:22 | Re: variadic function support |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-06-24 03:42:48 | Re: variadic function support |