From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY |
Date: | 2008-06-03 14:10:35 |
Message-ID: | 162867790806030710k1de1dc9ey3fafcc65d3515dbe@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/6/3 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:36:44PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Hello David
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
>>
>> Consider using hash buckets to do DISTINCT, rather than sorting This
>> would be beneficial when there are few distinct values. This is
>> already used by GROUP BY.
>
> It's nice to see that this is kinda on the TODO, but it doesn't
> address the question I asked, which is, "how would I get the planner
> to rewrite DISTINCTs as the equivalent GROUP BYs?" :)
you can't to do it :(
Pavel
>
> Any hints?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
> --
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-06-03 16:36:45 | Re: Case-Insensitve Text Comparison |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-06-03 14:03:06 | Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY |