From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: explain doesn't work with execute using |
Date: | 2008-06-01 15:43:48 |
Message-ID: | 162867790806010843n31b3ccafq26137a57b9043a20@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hello
2008/6/1 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I found following bug - using explain in stored procedures like:
>> ...
>> produce wrong result. Real plan is correct, etc variables are
>> substituted. Bud this explain show variables.
>
> This seems to be correctable with a one-line patch: make SPI_cursor_open
> set the CONST flag on parameters it puts into the portal (attached).
> I'm not entirely sure if it's a good idea or not --- comments?
We can do less invasive patch - it's much more ugly, but don't change
any other behave. I am afraid, so one-line patch can change behave of
explain statements in some cases where using variables is correct.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> Index: src/backend/executor/spi.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/spi.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.195
> diff -c -r1.195 spi.c
> *** src/backend/executor/spi.c 12 May 2008 20:02:00 -0000 1.195
> --- src/backend/executor/spi.c 1 Jun 2008 15:33:13 -0000
> ***************
> *** 997,1003 ****
> ParamExternData *prm = ¶mLI->params[k];
>
> prm->ptype = plan->argtypes[k];
> ! prm->pflags = 0;
> prm->isnull = (Nulls && Nulls[k] == 'n');
> if (prm->isnull)
> {
> --- 997,1010 ----
> ParamExternData *prm = ¶mLI->params[k];
>
> prm->ptype = plan->argtypes[k];
> ! /*
> ! * We mark the parameters as const. This has no effect for simple
> ! * execution of a plan, but if more planning happens within the
> ! * portal (eg via EXPLAIN), the effect will be to treat the
> ! * parameters as constants. This is good and correct as long as
> ! * no plan generated inside the portal is used outside it.
> ! */
> ! prm->pflags = PARAM_FLAG_CONST;
> prm->isnull = (Nulls && Nulls[k] == 'n');
> if (prm->isnull)
> {
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
spi_execute_using_explain.diff | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-01 15:55:52 | Re: explain doesn't work with execute using |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-01 15:36:25 | Re: explain doesn't work with execute using |