| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Guillaume Bog" <guibog(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql RECORD data type, how to access to the values |
| Date: | 2008-04-06 08:07:24 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790804060107m201bd99ag8cac53b7e9db2c18@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> This read-only table is modified (delete + insert) by a trigger
> function set on another table, but this second trigger calls the first
> and I can modify my read-only table. I'd like my "read-only" trigger
> to be aware that the modification call on the read-only table comes
> from the second trigger. Is it possible?
PostgreSQL call triggers in alphabet order
>
> I have read in some places that I should use a rule instead, but I
> never used them and it seems complex. I would prefer not to set up
> complex access rules with GRANT and REVOKE because my access rules in
> simple and works now. The best solution I can think of so far is to
> have the client application work with a view, but having this behavior
> fully managed through triggers would be more natural and I fear I
> missed something in the docs.
>
it's depend on application
Pavel
> > Regards
> > Pavel Stehule
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harald Fuchs | 2008-04-06 09:06:14 | Re: Numbering rows by date |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2008-04-06 04:11:36 | Re: Text Search Configuration Problem |