Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Date: 2008-01-17 19:15:28
Message-ID: 162867790801171115g430f5035x562b698fc7327eb7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If primary goal is ANSI SQL conformance shouldn't we be focusing on
> pl/psm not plpgsql? (yes I am aware they are similar syntatically)

I am not sure if in 8.4 will be space for changes in PL interprets. I
expect so plpgsql will be main SQL language next two years. I don't
plan any big changes - some cases like this is different (it's 2days
work).

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-01-17 19:35:01 Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-17 18:30:51 Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4