From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-26 22:03:11 |
Message-ID: | 162867790709261503o70182b43s669422b1ed21fc43@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hello Bruce
I really unlike this game about change the name. If you get 100%
support then situation is simple, but you hasn't it. I use PostgreSQL,
Postgres and I doesn't any strong benefit with change of name.
Devrim's argument about renaming all packages is really strong for me.
I agree so official documentation have to use only name PostgreSQL. Is
technical documentation not articles. And again I don't see any
benefit. Currently Postgres is well know synonym for PostgreSQL and
there isn't necessary push it into documentation. Please stop it.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2007/9/26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >>>>> But without such changes the alias is only in the FAQ and will not be
> > >>>>> widely used.
> > >>>> I'm not sure if this has been thought through to the end. If we make
> > >>>> the point that PostgreSQL can also be called Postgres, this does not
> > >>>> prevent anyone from calling it Postgre or any other forms that we might
> > >>>> not like. It might in fact make people think that it has various names
> > >>>> and you can call it whatever you want.
> > >>> Well, they are already calling it "Postgre" without our help, so I see
> > >>> us giving them a clear alternative to PostgreSQL as helping avoid
> > >>> "Postgre".
> > >>>
> > >>> But in the end, they can continue calling us whatever they want and we
> > >>> can't stop them.
> > >> Then why are we bothering trying?
> > >
> > > Because though we can't _stop_ them, we can certainly influence them.
> > > Why are you asking such simplistic questions?
> >
> > It seemed odd to me. You said, "we can't stop them". So it seems like an
> > awful lot of wasted effort to try.
>
> Not sure why you see this as fatalist. I can't _make_ many people do
> much, but I can encourage them to do things, as you have seen. That's
> what we are doing here to encourage the use of "Postgres".
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-26 22:04:40 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Previous Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2007-09-26 21:59:27 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |