Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Cc: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Date: 2007-08-14 04:24:43
Message-ID: 162867790708132124k3cada7ecu9ea06e8683aaedce@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hello
>
> Well due to 1) and similar effects I would assume that a rollback is
> more expensive for them.
>

I did't test MySQL three years, But three years ago, MySQL rollback
was really, really slow.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-14 05:16:15 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-14 02:31:25 Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes