Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Affan Salman" <affan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names
Date: 2007-07-16 05:54:23
Message-ID: 162867790707152254v4176cb30xfd3848ffc38b7661@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Anyway it seems like this whole area is a research project for 8.4
> or later, not something we should try to fix now. But having said
> that, there didn't seem to be any objection to the idea of changing
> the outer block (where function parameters are declared) to be labeled
> with the function name, instead of having no label as at present.
> Does anyone think we should not do that for 8.3?
>

I am for 8.3

Regards
Pavel Stehule

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-07-16 07:46:39 Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-16 02:23:36 Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names