Re: further testing on IDE drives

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: further testing on IDE drives
Date: 2003-10-13 13:35:17
Message-ID: 16266.43541.10798.861464@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

BM> COPY only does fsync on COPY completion, so I am not sure there are
BM> enough fsync's there to make a difference.

Perhaps then it is part of the indexing that takes so much time with
the WAL. When I applied Marc's WAL disabling patch, it shaved nearly
50 minutes off of a 4-hour restore.

I sent to Tom the logs from the restores since he was interested in
figuring out where the time was saved.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seum-Lim Gan 2003-10-13 13:52:05 Re: Performance, vacuum and reclaiming space, fsm
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-13 10:27:23 Re: Another weird one with an UPDATE