Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-09 13:28:52
Message-ID: 16261.25236.660006.404380@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "OE" == Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:

OE> MySQL's licence does not require you to buy a licence for _any_
OE> commercial use, but only for commercial use where you do not release
OE> your source code under a GPL-compatible licence.

So if I write my application in python, say, and only relase the .pyc
files, I'm not linked to mysql, but I use it via the API provided by
the python runtime. The GPL does not require me to release the source
code to my application, yet I'm using mysql in a commercial setting.
I believe that mysql will demand a license fee from me in this
situation.

It is very murky with mysql.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message nolan 2003-10-09 13:33:12 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2003-10-09 13:25:30 Re: relation vs table...