Re: pgindent run

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent run
Date: 2021-06-28 14:56:30
Message-ID: 162465.1624892190@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 6/28/21 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wait ... I did already, at 5a0f1c8c0. Are you sure you were indenting
>> current HEAD?

> No, see revised patch. I posted at 10.13

Right, new version looks better.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-28 15:01:57 Re: Can a child process detect postmaster death when in pg_usleep?
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-06-28 14:51:06 Re: Can a child process detect postmaster death when in pg_usleep?