Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)aol(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented
Date: 2018-09-03 13:58:57
Message-ID: 16242.1535983137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)aol(dot)com> writes:
>> Whee ... so you get to cope with all the bugs/idiosyncrasies of three
>> operating system layers, not just one. I concur that running Postgres
>> in the underlying Windows O/S is probably a much better idea.

> Me too, but this is purely for learning and I am much more use to Linux stack then ... gasp Windows :-)

Hmm, so maybe you should install Ubuntu as the native O/S, and when
you need Windows, run it inside a VM?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mate Varga 2018-09-03 14:38:24 Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2018-09-03 13:57:08 Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC