Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
Date: 2013-01-25 18:42:48
Message-ID: 16241.1359139368@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:35:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch seems pretty bizarre. What is the difference between a
>> "configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"? Why would you
>> point people to two different places for those two terms?

> Should I make them both "configuration parameter" and leave the
> "security" as a second one separate?

Works for me. I think "configuration parameter" is the phrase we
use most places.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-25 18:45:23 Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-25 18:41:43 Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index