Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing
Date: 2005-12-06 21:01:57
Message-ID: 16237.1133902917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> writes:
> 1) run a transaction repeatedly, trying to hit a point of no concurrent
> transactions,

In the sort of 24x7 environment that people are arguing this is needed
for, it's entirely possible that that will *never* succeed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-12-06 21:07:45 Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-06 21:00:35 Re: Upcoming PG re-releases