From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
Cc: | Rajni Bobal <rajnibobal(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4 |
Date: | 2025-01-16 15:58:28 |
Message-ID: | 1623377.1737043108@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
> #18776 appears to have been discarded as a duplicate. In any case, no
> one is going to fix a bug in 9.4 which has been EOL since 2020. I
> suggest you upgrade to a supported version and re-report the bug if it
> still exists.
If you do reproduce your problem on a still-in-support branch,
please re-file with a *self-contained* test case. It's impossible
for someone to reverse-engineer your problem from just the two
function definitions, with no table declarations, sample data,
calling sequence, or expected vs. actual results.
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems
If it's difficult to cram all the details into our bug-reporting
form, personally I'd ignore the form and just send mail to
pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-01-16 16:02:59 | Re: BUG #18775: PQgetCopyData always has an out-of-memory error if the table field stores bytea ~700 MB |
Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2025-01-16 14:55:25 | Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4 |