Re: Very large table...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeffery Collins <collins(at)onyx-technologies(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very large table...
Date: 2000-06-14 23:30:31
Message-ID: 16230.961025431@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeffery Collins <collins(at)onyx-technologies(dot)com> writes:
> Does anyone have any experience with very large postgresql tables? By
> very large, I mean a table with ~38 million records, each record will
> have between 80 and 128 bytes (we are not sure of some column sizes yet)
> in ~10 columns with probably 3 btree-indexes. Basically the table will
> hold all of the Postal Service deliverable addresses in the US in a
> somewhat compressed form.

> My concerns are in the area of performance and robustness.

Should be OK as long as you are using a recent release (preferably 7.0).
Our support for tables over 2 gig used to be a little flaky, but it's
been wrung out...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Franck Martin 2000-06-15 00:00:24 Library database ?
Previous Message Robert B. Easter 2000-06-14 23:29:46 Re: PL/TCL spi_exec insert problem