Re: One process per session lack of sharing

Hi

> I admit that it is risky, but I think there are things that could be
> done to limit the risk. I don't believe we can indefinitely continue
> to ignore the potential performance benefits of making a switch like
> this. Breaking a thirty-year old code base irretrievably would be
> sad, but letting it fade into irrelevance because we're not willing to
> make the architecture changes that are needed to remain relevant would
> be sad, too.

I can add, that nowadays it seems
that the paralleling processing is the only way to scale.
They can't wait that CPU Clock Speeds Increased in in the coming
years.

I understand that use of thread has some difficulties.
I can not understand why use of thread can have disadvantages.
Actually I think that parallelling using threads is much easy than
parallelling using processes.