Re: Procedure Size Limitation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Terence Gannon <tgannon(at)stoneboat(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Procedure Size Limitation
Date: 2000-06-08 15:15:14
Message-ID: 16214.960477314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Terence Gannon <tgannon(at)stoneboat(dot)com> writes:
> In version 6.5.3 (and ealier?) versions of PostgreSQL, there was a
> limitation on the size of a procedure...something on the order of 1800
> characters. Has this been eliminatd in 7+? Is there any limitation to
> the size of a procedure written in plpgsql?

7.0 is better, but not there yet. We still have the tuple-size
constraint for function definitions, but we did get rid of the index
on prosrc that led to a circa-2500-byte limit on definition length.
Now the limit is ~8K, or ~32K if you want to run with nonstandard
BLCKSZ.

7.1 should fix this problem for real.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Daniels 2000-06-08 15:16:56 FreeBSD PostgreSQL7 port and v7.0.2
Previous Message Ken Causey 2000-06-08 15:05:39 PostgreSQL on Cobalt Qube2?