| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Terence Gannon <tgannon(at)stoneboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Procedure Size Limitation |
| Date: | 2000-06-08 15:15:14 |
| Message-ID: | 16214.960477314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Terence Gannon <tgannon(at)stoneboat(dot)com> writes:
> In version 6.5.3 (and ealier?) versions of PostgreSQL, there was a
> limitation on the size of a procedure...something on the order of 1800
> characters. Has this been eliminatd in 7+? Is there any limitation to
> the size of a procedure written in plpgsql?
7.0 is better, but not there yet. We still have the tuple-size
constraint for function definitions, but we did get rid of the index
on prosrc that led to a circa-2500-byte limit on definition length.
Now the limit is ~8K, or ~32K if you want to run with nonstandard
BLCKSZ.
7.1 should fix this problem for real.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Daniels | 2000-06-08 15:16:56 | FreeBSD PostgreSQL7 port and v7.0.2 |
| Previous Message | Ken Causey | 2000-06-08 15:05:39 | PostgreSQL on Cobalt Qube2? |