| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marcelo Lacerda <marceloslacerda(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: check_function_bodies not doing much |
| Date: | 2018-08-07 19:47:19 |
| Message-ID: | 16207.1533671239@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes. It's supposed to be a syntax check, not a check that the function
>> would work when executed. (Depending on the particular PL you're using,
>> which you didn't mention, it might be a pretty weak syntax check too.)
> The quoted text includes "however when I use it in a plpgsql function" so
> we're good there.
Ah, you're right, my apologies for reading too hastily.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2018-08-07 21:44:55 | Re: check_function_bodies not doing much |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-08-07 19:38:02 | Re: check_function_bodies not doing much |