Re: Constraint exclusion description bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Constraint exclusion description bug?
Date: 2005-11-04 18:25:15
Message-ID: 16198.1131128715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I really haven't read up much on the constraint exclusion feature, but
> this description in guc.c really doesn't want to make me use it. :)

> "This prevents table access if the table constraints guarantee that
> table access is necessary."

> This is a typo, right?

One hopes ;-). I was planning to make an editorial pass over those doc
additions anyway ... will definitely get it done now. Or are you doing
that already?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2005-11-04 18:26:52 Re: insert performance for win32
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-11-04 18:21:07 Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32