Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2025-03-26 16:15:13
Message-ID: 1619480.1743005713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> Thanks for review! Pushed after making the above changes and taking it for
> another CI run.

CF entry should be marked closed no?

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5060/

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-03-26 16:26:32 Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-03-26 16:14:21 Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset