| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results |
| Date: | 2006-06-22 17:48:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1619.1150998493@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:52 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I believe our supported version is still 2.5.4, which is
>> what all my linux systems have.
> Its not clear to me why some people have such antipathy toward recent
> flex releases, but if our only supported flex version is 2.5.4, I think
> this should be documented: the current installation instructions only
> say that "Flex 2.5.4 or later" should be used for CVS builds.
Some of them appear to be actively broken :-(. If we knew exactly which
ones they were, we'd document that, but I don't think we have a handle
on why some 2.5.x flexes barf and others don't.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-06-22 17:49:36 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2006-06-22 17:48:06 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |