From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Date: | 2008-06-06 15:12:56 |
Message-ID: | 1618.1212765176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Text config files are NOT friendly for beginner and mediocre users. IMHO
> the current restriction on GUC changes is a major obstacle towards pgsql
> tuning tools, e.g. written as a Google SoC project. Graphic tools aren't
> too popular at pgsql-hackers, but please contemplate a little how much
> pgadmin may have contributed to the pgsql usage boost, esp. on windows.
I grow weary of this thread. I will say it once more: I do not believe
for one instant that the current formatting of postgresql.conf is the
major impediment, or even a noticeable impediment, to producing a useful
configuration wizard. If you wish to prove otherwise, provide a
complete wizard except for the parts that touch the config file, and
I will promise to finish it.
I will not read or respond to any further discussion of changing the
config file format. It's a waste of bandwidth.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-06 15:16:50 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-06-06 14:58:19 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |