Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-06 15:12:56
Message-ID: 1618.1212765176@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Text config files are NOT friendly for beginner and mediocre users. IMHO
> the current restriction on GUC changes is a major obstacle towards pgsql
> tuning tools, e.g. written as a Google SoC project. Graphic tools aren't
> too popular at pgsql-hackers, but please contemplate a little how much
> pgadmin may have contributed to the pgsql usage boost, esp. on windows.

I grow weary of this thread. I will say it once more: I do not believe
for one instant that the current formatting of postgresql.conf is the
major impediment, or even a noticeable impediment, to producing a useful
configuration wizard. If you wish to prove otherwise, provide a
complete wizard except for the parts that touch the config file, and
I will promise to finish it.

I will not read or respond to any further discussion of changing the
config file format. It's a waste of bandwidth.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-06 15:16:50 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-06-06 14:58:19 Re: Overhauling GUCS