Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)
Date: 2008-06-28 02:34:26
Message-ID: 16171.1214620466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Is there an easy way for an Admin clean-up the lost temp tables that
> autovacuum is complaining about? It seems like it could be along time
> and a lot of log messages between when they are first orphaned and and
> finally dropped due to anti-wraparound protection.

Drop the particular temp schema, maybe? The log message should probably
make sure to specify the schema name.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-28 03:14:36 Re: the un-vacuumable table
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-06-28 01:22:25 PATCH: CITEXT 2.0