Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, mike(at)fuhr(dot)org, systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Date: 2006-07-18 22:44:52
Message-ID: 16157.1153262692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Because we don't have control over the email contents (think Google), I
>> don't think we can renumber old email items without a continual stream
>> of complaints from users.

> I always wonder why we don't add a unique id to each email message
> itself.

But that doesn't do anything to fix the immediate problem ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-07-18 22:48:52 Re: feature request: pg_dump --view
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2006-07-18 22:31:19 Re: url for TODO item, is it right?