Re: Bug? (geo operator @ )

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Lau <iedaniel(at)ust(dot)hk>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug? (geo operator @ )
Date: 2003-12-22 15:33:59
Message-ID: 16144.1072107239@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Daniel Lau <iedaniel(at)ust(dot)hk> writes:
> I was to extract the '_lines' (path) if the lines are contained or on by a
> box-like polygon. The result turns wrong if the box-like polygon is
> changed from a square (x_max = y_max) to a rectangle (x_max <> y_max).

The examples you give are not "box-like"; they are in fact just line
segments. You need four points to define a box-like polygon.

AFAICS the quoted example is correct behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-12-22 20:23:53 Re: ecpg c++ scope operator lost
Previous Message Mark Pether 2003-12-22 14:33:00 Re: ecpg c++ scope operator lost