From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? |
Date: | 2003-05-23 18:04:28 |
Message-ID: | 16078.25260.512996.337914@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> In particular, is user_list_owner_id redundant to
>> user_list_oid_created?
TL> Any of the three indexes can be used for a search on owner_id alone, so
TL> yeah, user_list_owner_id is redundant. It would be marginally faster to
TL> use user_list_owner_id for such a search, just because it's physically
TL> smaller than the other two indexes, but against that you have to balance
TL> the extra update cost of maintaining the additional index.
This is great info. That extra index is gonna be nuked in about 37.23
seconds... It takes up a lot of space and is wasting time with
updates and inserts, which happen a *lot* on that table (nearly 10
million rows).
Thanks!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-05-23 18:12:10 | Re: return multiple rows |
Previous Message | Nam Nguyen | 2003-05-23 18:00:22 | unsubscribe |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-05-23 18:30:03 | Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 17:38:37 | Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-05-23 18:30:03 | Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 17:38:37 | Re: [ADMIN] Q: Structured index - which one runs faster? |