Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?
Date: 2014-01-27 17:49:49
Message-ID: 16073.1390844989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
>> the idea that we might get many dozen such warnings on more-current
>> compilers is scarier, as that might well interfere with people's
>> ability to do development on, say, Windows. Could somebody check
>> whether MSVC for instance complains about format strings using "z"?
>> Or shall I just commit this and we'll see what the buildfarm says?

> Given the lack of response, I've pushed the patch, and will canvass
> the buildfarm results later.

Just to follow up on that, I couldn't find any related warnings in the
buildfarm this morning (although there is one laggard machine, "anole",
which uses an unusual compiler and still hasn't reported in).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-27 17:50:00 Re: new json funcs
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-01-27 17:44:41 Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET