Re: mingw configure failure workaround

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Date: 2004-05-01 20:42:20
Message-ID: 16068.1083444140@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> And if not 3), is there some autoconf wizard out there who can help do
> this properly? It would probably take me many hours to work out, as I
> have never touched the beast.

Obviously, or you would know that configure is a generated file that
there is no point in editing by hand.

The real issue in my mind is why is "ln" unreliable in mingw? I cannot
see any point in a retry kluge when we do not know what's really going
on.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-01 21:00:32 Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-01 20:35:30 Re: FW: Timezone library

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-01 21:00:32 Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-01 15:16:57 mingw configure failure workaround

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-01 21:00:32 Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-01 20:35:30 Re: FW: Timezone library