| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 17:12:43 |
| Message-ID: | 16060.1459271563@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> There's a number of cases during early startup/auth where we really
> don't want client to get messages.
Right, which we handle at present with ClientAuthInProgress. But
I think it's worth drawing a distinction between "don't send message
to client because of the state we're in" and "don't send this message
to client because it's security-sensitive". The latter is better
handled by annotations attached to specific ereport sites, the former
not.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-29 17:13:08 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-29 17:09:05 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |