| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, "Lada 'Ray' Lostak" <ray(at)unreal64(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |
| Date: | 2003-12-01 06:27:03 |
| Message-ID: | 16051.1070260023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> It will require an initdb -- should I hold off for other
> pending changes also requiring initdb?
No, there's no particular reason to avoid initdbs during development
cycles. That's why we have catversion in the first place ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-12-01 06:31:38 | Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-12-01 06:22:51 | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-01 10:48:40 | Re: clock_timestamp() and transaction_timestamp() function |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-12-01 06:22:51 | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |