The relationship between 'min_wal_size', 'max_wal_size' and 'wal_segment_size' is not record.

From: PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: zhoushulin1992(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: The relationship between 'min_wal_size', 'max_wal_size' and 'wal_segment_size' is not record.
Date: 2020-11-10 08:25:27
Message-ID: 160499672788.25505.14713165949107174380@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/bug-reporting.html
Description:

configuration option 'min_wal_size' and 'max_wal_size' must be at least
twice 'wal_segment_size', but none of these information was mentioned in the
description of these three configuration options, nor in related document in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/runtime-config-wal.html,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/runtime-config-preset.html, and
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/wal-configuration.html.

Although the default value of 'min_wal_size' and 'max_wal_size' is much
larger than 'wal_segment_size', in case of some corner case, I think it is
better to supplement this information in the doc.

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2020-11-10 08:28:08 'pg_global' cannot be used as default_tablespace.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-11-10 01:36:32 Re: What does "[backends] should seldom or never need to wait for a write to occur" mean?