| From: | Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowley(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
| Date: | 2020-10-30 16:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 160407451328.1204.14768882331709534502.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Status update for a commitfest entry.
It looks like there was no real progress on this issue since April. I see only an experimental patch. What kind of review does it need right now? Do we need more testing or maybe production statistics for such queries?
David, are you going to continue working on it?
Can you, please, provide a short summary of the problem and list open questions for reviewers.
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-30 16:29:05 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2020-10-30 15:39:21 | Re: BUG #16692: Postgres process using 100 percent CPU |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-30 16:29:05 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
| Previous Message | Georgios Kokolatos | 2020-10-30 16:13:13 | Re: Error on failed COMMIT |