| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OOM on EXPLAIN with lots of nodes |
| Date: | 2015-01-15 18:45:51 |
| Message-ID: | 16015.1421347551@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Not sure whether to just commit this to HEAD and call it a day, or to
>> risk back-patching.
> I think we need to back-patch something; that's a pretty nasty
> regression, and I have some EDB-internal reports that might be from
> the same cause.
OK. I went ahead and made the necessary code changes to avoid changing
the struct size in released branches, as per Heikki's idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-01-15 18:47:05 | Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-01-15 18:36:00 | Re: compress method for spgist - 2 |