Re: APR 1.0 released

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APR 1.0 released
Date: 2004-09-04 22:13:44
Message-ID: 16009.1094336024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
> use it on Postgres?

The sense of the question is backwards. Why *should* we use it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2004-09-04 22:25:58 Adding columns in the middle of tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-09-04 22:02:39 Re: huge execution time difference with almost same plan