From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: 7.3 failure on platypus |
Date: | 2005-12-15 18:31:09 |
Message-ID: | 16005.1134671469@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> The one thing I am wondering is would people accept older OS's into the
> buildfarm? I think there are still a lot of servers running red hat 7.3,
> that might be an example of an old OS that we could put into the buildfarm to
> test for the 7.3.x or 7.4.x series.
Sure. I don't see any reason the newer branches shouldn't be expected
to pass on such machines, either.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-15 20:02:38 | Re: 7.3 failure on platypus |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-15 18:29:28 | Re: 7.3 failure on platypus |