| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Date: | 2022-03-22 17:04:15 |
| Message-ID: | 15e21fc0-a23b-bd8d-d71c-2cf326c97971@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/22/22 12:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mar 22, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> As a quick-n-dirty fix to avoid reverting the entire test module,
>>> perhaps just delete this error check for now.
>> Ok, done as you suggest:
> I only suggested removing the error check in _PG_init, not
> changing the way the test works.
>
>
Mark and I discussed this offline, and decided there was no requirement
for the module to be preloaded. Do you have a different opinion?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2022-03-22 17:04:55 | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-22 16:58:19 | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |